Anti-corruption day 9 December: Protection of whistleblowers is key to fighting corruption
09 December 2016
The new PSI report Checkmate to corruption: Making the case for a wide-ranging initiative on whistleblower protection, highlights the issues surrounding whistleblowing and calls for a robust whistleblower protection framework to shield workers fighting corruption.
PSI’s fight against corruption kicked off at its November 2012 World Congress. Since then, PSI’s has aligned its anti-corruption campaign to the fight for global tax justice – focusing on challenging tax havens and secretive deals between governments and multinationals, which lead to billions of dollars in taxes not being paid into state budgets – and the need to protect whistleblowers. PSI has argued that a key alternative to crushing austerity and cuts in public spending is through a serious effort to fight corruption.
PSI also worked successfully towards the inclusion of a reference to the protection of whistleblowers and the need to fight corruption in the conclusions of several ILO tripartite documents. It was included in June 2016 in the revision of ILO recommendation 71 on the transition from war to peace, in September 2016 in ILO Guidelines on Fair recruitment, and in July 2016 in the ILO response to the refugee crisis. Fighting corruption is also strongly embedded in the 2030 Agenda. Protecting whistleblowers should therefore be part of SDG indicators.
Commenting on the need to combat corruption, PSI General Secretary Rosa Pavanelli, said:
“Corruption undermines the funding of public services, transparency, and the credibility of governments. Corruption leads to less prosperity, fewer jobs, less rights, and we will never win the battle against corruption if we cannot protect the workers who stand up against it! This is why PSI campaigns for a comprehensive and ambitious framework for the protection of whistleblowers – to safeguard their jobs, their security, and their lives. But also to make the fight against corruption a credible and serious commitment. There is an important role here for social partners and the ILO. The ILO Convention on Termination of Employment of 1982 was one of the first international instruments to include whistleblower protection by providing that filing a complaint or participating in proceedings against an employer are not valid reasons for dismissal and by establishing that the burden for proving the reason for dismissal should rest on the employer. In the case of protecting whistleblowers, this reverse burden of proof has been essential. The ILO has a role again in taking that protection further.”
Whistleblower protection is gaining momentum within the trade union movement – in addition to several national initiatives, the European trade unions are leading a campaign backed by EPSU and PSI, see the petition here https://whistleblowerprotection.eu/ :
Jan Willem Goudriaan, EPSU General Secretary, says:
“The appeal trial of the Luxleaks whistleblowers Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet and journalist Edouard Perrin beginning on 11th December in Luxembourg is a cruel reminder that Europe needs to protect whistleblowers not prosecute them. Our trade union petition and the support from the European Parliament mean that the time is ripe for the European Commission and Member States to take the lead in developing legislation that protects whistleblowers from reprisals and to recognise the role of trade unions to support workers who blow the whistle. We believe these actions will snowball into a global movement in support of whistleblowers”.
The Unión Internacional de Trabajadores de Organismos de Control (UITOC, then ULATOC) also campaigned for an ILO standard in 2009, supported by PSI.
To commemorate the International Anti-corruption Day, PSI is launching a new report: Checkmate to corruption: Making the case for a wide-ranging initiative on whistleblower protection – which contributes to the debate and provides arguments, evidence, and examples on how a robust protection for whistleblowers with the active support of trade unions is a major – if not the most important – tool to fight corruption. Some of the key findings of the report are:
- Whistleblowing arrangements are an important means of detecting fraud. Whistleblowing by employees is a more effective way of bringing wrongdoing to light than direct observation, routine controls, internal audits, external investigation, and external complaints. A recent Global Fraud Report showed that in 32% of cases where fraud was uncovered, an employee had blown the whistle to provide information that facilitated an investigation. In the US, 48% of cases where fraud was uncovered were facilitated by employees making whistleblower disclosures.
- The lack of whistleblowing protection frameworks leads to many forms of retaliation and reprisals, namely: ostracism, demotion, job loss, loss of income, assault and even murder. A series of studies in the US public sector suggests between 16% and 38% of workers who blow the whistle suffer retaliation. Similar percentages of whistleblower retaliation were found in Australia and the UK. However, in Norway retaliation rates are much lower - between 7 and 18% -thanks to strong legislation and very high unionisation rates.
- Based on an estimate in 13 countries, the number of workers who need whistleblower protection at some point is estimated at 7% of the global workforce.
- Whistleblowing to the media represents only the tip of the whistleblowing iceberg. Whistleblowers tend to raise their concerns with different audiences throughout the process, and the vast majority of whistleblowers tend to raise their concern internally more than once before going external, if they go external at all. Findings show that 97% of whistleblowing starts as voicing a concern internally, and 90% remains internal.
- Whistleblowing legislation and policies also carry a cost. However, whistleblower programmes shows that the benefits outweigh these costs. The involvement of whistleblowers in uncovering fraud and other wrongdoing implies longer regulatory proceedings, and thus increased costs. However, whistleblower involvement helps regulators to build stronger cases. The benefits of stronger cases are a higher success rate in proceedings, and higher monetary penalties. A specific whistleblowing framework for employees who can disclose inside knowledge or organisational wrongdoing is a necessary element of an anti-corruption system.
- Based on 37 years of lessons learned, the six key provisions of robust whistleblower protection legislation include: burden of proof on the employer, forum (independence of enforcement agencies), final relief, interim relief, corrective action, and support services (education and outreach). Although there are many examples of best practices on these six key provisions, the overall picture of whether and to what extent these key provisions are implemented in whistleblower legislation, is mixed. This calls for a benchmarking initiative by the ILO.
More info: